On May 14th,
the much anticipated final episode of "Seinfeld" was
broadcast. Ratings were high, although not as high as special
episodes of other popular shows, such as "Dallas"
and "MASH." The usual half hour program was expanded
into a two hour special, and advertising costs eclipsed those
of the Super Bowl.
Most of
the program's first hour flashed back on key episodes in
the series' history. The reason for this became clear as
the real final story unfolded.
Jerry, George,
Kramer, and Elaine find themselves on a private jet bound from
New York to Paris. For an absurd reason, the aircraft has to
make an emergency landing in mythical Latham, Massachusetts.
They are told that some checks have to be performed on the plane,
but in a few hours, they can resume their journey.
No sooner
does the foursome arrive in town to pass the time, then they
get into trouble. Our heros witness a carjacking taking place
across the street, and not only do nothing to help the victim,
they mock him, while Kramer videotapes the incident. Too bad
for the victim, but then too bad for the Seinfeld group!! It
seems that they ran afoul of a new forced Good Samaritan law.
In standing by doing nothing, they violated the new law, and
are put into jail.
Their trial
creates an opportunity for many whom the group has wronged in
the past to testify on behalf of the prosecution. Even their
Johnnie Cochran-like defense attorney can't get them off,
and they must all do one year in the slammer.
That the
story in Seinfeld's last episode was received with mixed
reviews is hardly a surprise. On its face, it is pretty stupid.
Flashbacks by the foursome covering some of the old shows with
a new spin would have been funnier, and more clever. The old
characters could have come back to face the group in a context
other than a courtroom.
The fact
is, the choice was made to build the whole thing around a "Good
Samaritan" concept.
The parable
of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:25-37) teaches us that a good
neighbor can sometimes be a most hated individual. The Jews
in New Testament times considered the Samaritans to be very
low on the human food chain--lower even than the pagans. But
yet, when one of their own was left to die by a robber, it was
the Samaritan, rather than the priest or Levite, who helped
the victim.
On "Seinfeld,"
we see an interesting twist to this parable. In effect, the
VICTIM becomes the Samaritan, as well. The carjacking victim
is a truly repulsive fat guy--not exactly the picture of a damsel
in distress. Ultimately, he was only helped after the fact by
the State, who also prosecuted the guilty bystanders.
If the final
"Seinfeld" aimed to teach us that the vapid selfishness
of the group would lead to their downfall, that's great.
But something (cynicism and experience) tells me that the show's
prime audience--GenXer's with roughly the same value system
as our heros--merely found it amusing. Any moral lessons need
not apply.