In 1963,
Life magazine ran a story about Marie Noe, a Philadelphia housewife
and part-time factory worker, who had lost six of her children
during infancy. None of them lived beyond the age of seven months.
To secure her position as the most bereaved mother in America,
two more babies were to die--one in 1966, and the last one in
1968.
Now, more
than thirty years after the final death, Mrs. Noe, 69, was arrested
at her home August 5th, and charged with first-degree murder
--accused of smothering eight of her children to death with
a pillow or another soft object. In her statement, Noe admitted
that she smothered four of the eight, but didn't remember
the specifics concerning the other four.
Mrs. Noe
was not charged in the deaths of two of her children. Letitia
was stillborn in 1959. Theresa suffered complications from birth
in 1963 and lived only six hours. Police said there was no reason
to suspect foul play.
Autopsies
were performed on all of the children except one, but at the
time, doctors could not offer any conclusive medical explanation
about why the babies died.
After medical
experts defined SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome) in 1969,
doctors believed that was how Mrs. Noe's babies died, according
to court documents.
The case
had never been closed, but the investigation into the deaths
intensified recently because of heightened interest in the unexplained
deaths of children and developments in medical and forensic
science.
The mystery
of multiple baby deaths in one family might have remained hidden
forever, were it not for the case of a Syracuse, N.Y., woman
named Waneta Hoyt, who appeared to have lost five babies to
SIDS during the 1960s. In 1994, Hoyt confessed to having smothered
the babies and was charged with murder.
That led
to the book "The Death of Innocents," in which authors
Richard Firstman and Jamie Talan called attention to the Hoyts
and several other infanticide cases that had first been attributed
to SIDS. In so doing, they rekindled 30-year-old suspicions
over the multiple Noe baby deaths.
Neither
police nor the district attorney would speculate on a motive,
though they said the Noes had taken out insurance policies on
six of the children.
Some excerpts
from the police affidavit for the arrest of Marie Noe are enlightening:
All of the
babies were normal at birth and all of them were healthy and
developing normally. All of the 8 infants were in the exclusive
custody of the mother, Marie Noe, at the family home at the
time of their deaths. All 8 infants were described by the mother
. . . as gasping for breath and turning blue. . . . "All
8 infants were pronounced dead on arrival at the various hospitals
where they were taken. Upon pronouncement of death, there was
no physical evidence of trauma and no reasonable medical explanation
nor any finding of natural disease. . . .
".
. . As to Infant #5, Constance Noe, Dr. Abraham Perlman was
interviewed on April 14, 1998. Dr. Perlman indicated that he
was working in the Pediatrics Department at St. Luke's Hospital
in February 1958 and he remembers attending and treating a newborn
baby by the name of Constance Noe. . . .
Due to the
history of the previous four deaths in the family, Dr. Perlman
ordered extensive studies for Constance Noe and all of them
came back normal. Upon discharge from the hospital, Dr. Perlman
told Mrs. Noe that Constance Noe was a beautiful baby. Marie
Noe responded: 'She's not going to live . . . just like
the others.'
Dr. Stephen
Ludwig [ a professor of pediatrics at Children's Hospital
of Philadelphia ] . . . was consulted concerning the history
of crib deaths. . . . Dr. Ludwig indicated that in the 1950s
and 1960s, the medical community had always been apprehensive
of making accusations of parents in cases involving the unexplained
deaths of infants. . . . He indicated that the medical community
has now acknowledged that one of the provable explanations for
SIDS is really infanticide. . . .
"Dr.
Ludwig reviewed all of the investigation reports, the death
certificates and the available autopsy reports as to all 8 of
the Noe infants that died in the exclusive custody of Marie
Noe and has concluded that the actual cause of death . . . was
suffocation and the manner of death is homicide."
What are
we to make of this?
Sadly, the
doctrine of "Where there's smoke, there's fire"
took a very long time to manifest itself. But then, contemplating
that a mother would murder her own offspring had little precedent.
(Remember, this was before Roe v. Wade).
It seems
clear that once SIDS was defined, it became a syndrome in search
of victims, all too often. Only recently, certain unusual viral
infections have been identified, which provide a much more reasonable
cause of death scenario in certain cases.
Medical
orthodoxy can lead otherwise intelligent physicians to really
put on the blinders. Shingles (herpes zoster) was traditionally
characterized as a disease that only appeared in severely immune
compromised individuals--elderly types waiting to die in nursing
homes, for example.
The problem
is that about 10 years ago, otherwise healthy children and adults
started presenting with Shingles. Is our immune response deteriorating
for some reason?
At this
moment, a cutting edge treatment for autism involves modulating
the immune system of affected individuals. Meanwhile, the establishment
autism gurus argue the finer points of various "accepted"
therapies, which basically don't work.
It's
high time that we open our minds--medically, forensically, socially,
culturally, and historically.