The Interscan
Monitor Newsletter > Volume
2, Number 4
Volume 2,
Number 4
WELCOME.....
Take a break from World
Cup excitement, to hear the latest from the boys in Chatsworth.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
THE TUNNEL MONITORING GUYS
STRIKE AGAIN
That's right!! Interscan
is the low bidder on a nice CO monitoring job for a few of New York City's
famous tunnels. Our proposal is being evaluated at the moment.
For "some reason" we
got lots of e-mail from the competitors right after the bid results came
in. It seems that they wanted to know how we could provide so much at such
a reasonable price.
But then, our customers
have known THAT for years.
More on this job in future
issues.
But, by all means, if YOU
are thinking of doing some tunnel monitoring, you know who to call...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
HYDRAZINE HEROICS
For those of you who have
to deal with this nasty compound, you might know that since the late 1970's,
Interscan has been a major monitoring instrument supplier.
Just recently, we got a
NASA contract to provide lots more units, tested to a special high standard.
Just another tough application.
Bring 'em on.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
COOL WEB AND SOFTWARE STUFF
Forget all
the search engines. The very best way to find web pages is with Web Ferret.
Download it at http://www.ferretsoft.com/netferret and let me know what you
think.
Check out the A-1 Icon
Archive, a site with access to over 300,000 free website graphics such as
icons, backgrounds, balls, clip art, pictures, as well as HTML helpers, HTML
editors, and more for you to download.
http://icons.simplenet.com/
One last item--If you're
a fanatic about having the correct time, the best time synchronization (SNTP)
client I've found is Socket Watch.
Download it from Locutus
Codeware. http://www.locutuscodeware.com/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
CALIBRATION THINGS TO PONDER
Although we're not in the
single digit parts per billion monitoring business, specs for this kind of
thing come across our desk.
One should never lose sight
of the fact that one or two parts per billion is an exceedingly low concentration,
and simply handling such concentrations--even if you can generate a reliable
standard--is definitely not a slam dunk.
What's more, what do you
use to zero the instrument? If one or two ppb are supposed to be a significant
reading, then your zero gas better be REALLY zero--like down to parts per
TRILLION.
Think about it. Hardly
anyone else does!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
DON'T METRICATE YOURSELF
UNNECESSARILY
In the above piece, we
talked about ppb, and I'll bet you understood what I meant. The same goes
for ppm.
How many of you have seen
the ridiculous units milligram/cubic meter or microgram/cubic meter?
They SOUND ultra metric,
don't they??
There's just one BIG problem.
Whereas ppm or ppb are independent of temperature or pressure, the "metric" units
aren't. Never mind the pressure problem, which frankly doesn't come up very
often.
However, temperature does--all
the time. In fact, to convert from ppm to milligrams or micrograms per cubic
meter requires one to ASSUME a temperature. What should it be? 20 deg C?
25 deg C? 0 deg C?
And, what nomenclature
does the instrument manufacturer put on the panel? "Milligrams per cubic
meter at 25 deg C"? What happens if the temperature isn't 25 deg C?
Help us fight these absurd
units. Parts per million, like color, romance, and your favorite movie, is
not a metric issue. In fact, since it expresses a ratio of volumes, it is
unit independent!! It has no units.
PS--If you need a formula
or Excel spreadsheet to do the conversions, send me an e-mail. As far as
I know, I'm the only person who cared enough to do the conversion accurately.
In this case, the decimal places DO make a difference.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SCADA NEWS
Interscan was the first
gas detection company to make use of Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
software. It lets us produce monitoring systems that are easy to use, and
have tremendous functionality.
Still, there is a downside.
This software can be expensive, and the available packages are overkill for
what we need.
We don't need to run the
New York subway system, we just want to monitor some inputs control some
devices, and archive the results.
To this end, we've been
evaluating some lesser known products that seem to fit the bill perfectly
for gas detection. We might even be distributing these packages beyond the
gas detection realm.
I should have further news
by the Fall.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Until next time, I remain
Your faithful webmaster
|