The Interscan
Monitor Newsletter > Volume
3, Number 3
Volume 3,
Number 3
WELCOME.....
To the Millennium Final
Edition
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Y2K
Have you noticed what I've
noticed? The hype is sure dying down, compared to late last year, and earlier
this year, when all we heard was gloom and doom.
I think what happened was
this:
When companies, such as
Interscan, started testing things, we found that we were actually in pretty
good shape, even before we made what few mods were required!
The biggest surprise here
was that our venerable voice mail system, even though it runs under DOS (Horrors!!)
transitions to 2000 with no problems at all.
Interscan's Y2K website
is http://www.gasdetection.com/TECH/tn_y2k.html
I hope that your company
has had the same good fortune.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ETHYLENE IS EXCELLENT
How about a new application??
Would you believe ethylene, in low-ppm levels?
That's right. Now you're
asking, who cares?
Many people do. Fruits,
vegetables, and flowers give off ethylene as a natural process. However,
when these products are harvested and stored, the levels can build up.
Too much ethylene will
cause the crops to ripen way too quickly. On the other hand, if you WANT
the crops to ripen faster, just add a little ethylene to the environment.
Great, except you need
to measure it. That's where we come in. We're already getting raves about
our portable ethylene analyzer, and serious inquiries about fixed, continuous
monitoring systems. In many cases, data logging is required, as well.
Contact John Mora at sales@gasdetection.com to
find out more.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
DETECTOR TUBES--TIME TO
PHASE THEM OUT
This story is about an
ethylene inquiry, but the moral is a lot more generic...
John got an inquiry about
ethylene monitoring, and quoted out a portable analyzer. Remember that you
have to read in the 0-10 ppm range, and even lower for certain crops.
The inquirer called him
back to say that he had found a detector for $250, and each test only cost
about $5. The gentleman was referring, of course, to detector tubes.
John cautioned him that
he would have difficulty reading in the concentration range of interest,
that there are serious potential interferences, and that the accuracy is
very poor. But hey, they're cheap.
All this guy wants to do
is protect about $250,000 worth of flowers!
Your webmaster is well
familiar with detector tubes, having been involved with the sales of this
product from 1978-1996. Back "in the day" they had certain advantages. They
were cheap (around $18.00 per box of 10), and this was well before inexpensive
instruments for the big gases (CO, CO2, H2S, NH3, Cl2) came on the scene.
However, even then, there
were a few dirty little secrets.
** You had line
extension to the max. The same chemistry was being used in tubes labeled
for different compounds.
** Interferences
were often not well documented.
** Unless an acid-base
reaction was taking place, using a classic indicator, the color changes
could be very nebulous.
** The specs on
tubes, from batch to batch, could vary widely. The British Columbia (Canada)
provincial government had a technician test each incoming batch against
standard analytical methods. Accuracy would vary from ±2 percent to ±100
percent.
** Finally, the
whole business was based on big users buying lots of tubes for the big
gases. Take away the common gases, and the market disappears. You can't
live on the phosgene tube market.
Fast forward to the present.
Now there ARE cheap instruments
for the common gases. Purchase a few boxes of tubes at $50 a box, and you
might as well buy a little instrument. The truth is, many companies HAVE
been buying little instruments, and the tube market is starting to dry up.
But, don't worry. The detector
tube companies have adjusted to these market conditions by raising their
prices!
So, for those applications
(such as ethylene and hundreds of others) where a cheap instrument is not
available, many users feel forced into using tubes, even at the higher prices.
Our recommendation is this:
Think twice about trusting
ANY gas detection application to devices that during their heyday were still
plagued with the problems detailed above. Do think that QC and performance
will improve now that their market is dying??
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
END OF THE MILLENNIUM WINDOWS
TIPS
By the way, if you are
one those who insists that the millennium ends on December 31, 2000, please
consider the following:
** The main attraction
is that the "1" is changing to a "2"
** Y1K was celebrated
and dreaded at the end of 999 A.D.
** The notion
that there was no "Year 0" is irrelevant in that the A.D. (anno domini)
designation of the current calendar already misses the birth of Jesus,
now estimated to be April 5, 4 B.C. (in fact, a lot closer to when Easter
is celebrated). Moreover, the main purpose of the calendar is to accurately
determine the recurrence of seasons. Thus, except for future historians,
whether this year is 1999 A.D. or 2003 A.D. is not exceedingly important;
to fixate on when the millennium actually begins is mere trivia.
I say--enjoy the party!!
Now for those tips (Courtesy
of Winfiles.com)...
** To add icons
to the start button, click and drag any object from the desktop and drop
it on the Start button.
** To avoid the
Startup Programs, Hold down the CTRL key while entering Windows.
** Emptying the
\Windows\Temp folder of all its contents, and then running a Scandisk and
Defrag can cure a lot of intermittent and annoying problems and also speed
your system response up. This folder is supposed to be emptied whenever
you shut down your computer, but if you don't shut it down or there are
other than ".tmp" files or folders in there, then they will not be removed.
This can cause boot problems, system lockups and shutdown hangups. These
files also take up space that could be better used for other things.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Until next time, I remain
Your faithful webmaster
|