It
HAS happened before.
Susan Estrich was campaign manager for losing Democratic presidential
candidate Michael Dukakis in 1988. Although the popular vote was
relatively close (53.4% to 45.6%), the electoral count was an
unmitigated disaster (426 to 111). Ironically, Dukakis' margin
in his home state of Massachusetts was a similarly slim 53.2%
to 45.4% over George Bush.
It was almost as if Estrich didn't understand our system of electing
presidents. Conveying an unnecessarily aggressive liberal agenda,
and then preaching mostly to the converted, Estrich was able to
win only certain traditionally hard-core liberal bastions. With
the exception of the District of Columbia, an electoral vote midget,
she was unable to score a single impressive state victory.
But yet, she was able to re-invent herself as a pundit, securing
positions as an academic and frequent media commentator.
Which brings us to Jill Barad.
Barad started off at toy titan Mattel as a product manager in
1981, drawing on her background as a beauty consultant and advertising
account executive. She was named president in 1992, and CEO and
chairman of the board in 1997. Fueled largely by tremendous sales
of the Barbie doll, the company was in pretty good shape.
Then came 1998. Barad embarked on the ill-advised $3.5 billion
acquisition of The Learning Company, which racked up gigantic
losses, causing Mattel's stock to drop nearly 60 percent.
Did Ms. Barad exit Mattel in the same condition she left the company?
Not exactly.
Filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission detail her
incredible $52 million severance package. Here are some highlights:
- $26.3 million
in compensation under her employment contract
- $106,745
a month for 10 years
- $3.3 million
to pay taxes
- $7.2 million
in loans to her forgiven by the company
One wonders
what her severance package would have been if she were successful!
Perhaps the
company was worried about bad PR or litigation. At these prices,
though, I would have taken my chances.
What kind
of message does this send? Was she treated differently because
she is a woman? To be sure, there are many cases of men getting
excessive severance packages after poor performance, but Barad's
arrangement set new highs in terms of its broad publicity, in
view of the extravagance.
Is there
a hidden agenda in all this? The stockholders might be able to
force out an officer, but by God, you'll pay!! Was the Barbie
doll actually a Voodoo doll?
Who can say?
At least
with respect to golden parachutes, Mattel lived up to its 1950's
advertising slogan: You can tell it's Mattel, it's swell!