This material is presented on OSHA’s website as a Safety and Health Information Bulletin [SHIB 09-30-2013]. The content was written by the International Safety Equipment Association (ISEA). We post the article here, and offer commentary in maroon type…
The information in this Safety and Health Information Bulletin (SHIB) provides workers and employers guidance on calibrating and testing direct-reading portable gas monitors (hereafter, “DRPGMs” or “instruments”). These instruments protect workers from unseen workplace gas hazards. Proper maintenance and calibration of the instruments ensures their accuracy in detecting worker exposure to harmful gases in the workplace. Follow the manufacturer’s recommendations with regard to calibrating the instruments.
Please! Can we—at long last—put a stake through the heart of this term “direct-reading”? It was introduced in the 1970s to identify those detector tubes whereby the gas concentration could be read directly from their graduated scale. That was to distinguish them from “color comparison” detector tubes, which required the user to refer to a chart that matched the extent of color development to the estimated gas concentration. For well over 40 years, ALL portable gas monitors have been “direct-reading.”
DRPGMs are designed to alert workers to toxic gases, as well as oxygen-deficient and combustible atmospheres that may exist in their workplace environments, such as permit-required confined spaces, manholes, and other enclosed spaces. Several OSHA standards require the use of gas monitors. See paragraph (c)(5)(ii)(C) of 29 CFR 1910.146 (Permit-required confined spaces); paragraph (c)(6) of 29 CFR 1910.120 (Hazardous waste operations and emergency response); and section 5 (Entry into bins, silos, and tanks) of Appendix A of 29 CFR 1910.272 (Grain handling facilities). OSHA recommends developing standard procedures for calibrating and using DRPGMs that include documentation to verify the proper maintenance and calibration of the instruments.
Instrument inaccuracy due to improper or irregular maintenance and calibration can lead to exposure to hazardous levels of toxic gases or to an oxygen-deficient atmosphere. This exposure can cause workers to suffer serious injuries or illness, and even death. Flammable gas explosions are often catastrophic, resulting in worker injuries and death, or destruction of property.
The best way to verify that a DRPGM detects gas accurately and reliably is to test it with a known concentration of gas. This procedure will verify whether the sensors in the instrument respond accurately and whether the alarms function properly.
Great advice. However, the problem has always been availability of suitable calibration standards, especially for those compounds with low concentration PELs. There’s more to life than CO, H2S, combustibles, and oxygen deficiency.
The International Safety Equipment Association (ISEA), founded in 1933, is a trade association for manufacturers of protective equipment, including DRPGMs. The ISEA recommends, at a minimum, verifying the operational capability of these instruments before each day’s use, with additional testing conducted as necessary. This SHIB incorporates recommendations developed by the ISEA.
Calibration: The Key to Accurate Readings
Operators use DRPGMs to detect the presence and concentration of toxic and combustible gases, as well as oxygen deficiency or oxygen enrichment (which is a fire and explosion hazard). Workers must not rely solely on their sense of smell to alert them to these hazards. Employers should ensure that workers use these instruments when working in areas with potential hazardous atmospheres.
“Calibration” refers to an instrument’s measuring accuracy relative to a known traceable concentration of test gas. DRPGMs compare the sensor’s response to a known concentration of the test gas. To confirm the validity of this comparison, it is important to ensure the calibration gas has not expired (always check the expiration date of the gas before usage). The instrument’s response to the calibration gas serves as the reference point.
Let’s be more careful with our definitions. Usually, “calibration” refers to the act of adjusting an instrument, with the use of an accepted standard. An instrument is said to be “in calibration” if the deviation of its measurement performance (usually accuracy) falls within an allowable tolerance. In some cases, both a span and zero standard are required. “Span” refers to a known concentration of the gas in question: “zero” is nitrogen or air (sometimes argon) free from contaminants to an acceptable degree.
The responsiveness of sensors will vary with workplace environmental conditions, such as temperature and humidity. Therefore, to the degree possible, operators should calibrate sensors in environmental conditions that are the same as (or similar to) the actual workplace conditions. Follow the manufacturer’s guidelines for proper calibration.
Standard procedures for regular calibration that conform to the manufacturer’s instructions, internal company policy, and/or the appropriate regulatory agency guidelines will help to ensure that calibration procedures are readily followed by the DRPGM operators, and that the instruments are operable and accurate when used. Employers should keep calibration records for the life of each instrument. This record enables operators to quickly identify a DRPGM that has a history of excessive maintenance/repair, or is prone to erratic readings, and to track drift of the sensors to determine when they need replacement.
Calibration Drift and Causes
When an instrument’s reference point shifts, the reading will shift accordingly and be unreliable. This is called “calibration drift,” and it happens to all sensors over time. An instrument that experiences calibration drift can still measure the quantity of gas present, but it cannot convert this information into an accurate numerical reading. Calibration checks or full calibration with a traceable gas concentration will verify or update the instrument’s reference point. Operators should conduct these procedures daily, or more frequently if needed, to ensure that the instrument will continue to produce accurate readings. Calibration drift occurs most often because of:
- Degradation caused by exposure to phosphates
- Degradation of phosphorus-containing components
- Degradation of lead-containing components
- Gradual chemical degradation of sensors and drift in electronic components that occur normally over time.
- Use in extreme environmental conditions, such as high/low temperature and humidity, and high levels of airborne particulates.
- Exposure to high concentrations of the target gases and vapors.
- Exposure of catalytic hot-bead LEL sensors in the instruments to volatile silicones, hydride gases, halogenated hydrocarbons, and sulfide gases.
- Exposure of electrochemical toxic gas sensors to solvent vapors and highly corrosive gases.
- Handling/jostling of the equipment causing enough vibration or shock over time to affect electronic components and circuitry.
While this is useful information, it is worth pointing out that the phenomenon described is not “drift.” In accordance with ANSI/ISA–51.1–1979 (R1993), entitled Process Instrumentation Terminology, “Drift” is defined as “An undesired change in output over a period of time, which change is unrelated to the input, environment, or load.” Here, ISEA is referring mostly to environmental effects on the sensor. The calibration can also shift due to matters related to instrumentation electronics.
Operators should validate a DRPGM’s operability when any of these conditions occurs, or is suspected, during use. When attempting to calibrate an instrument after exposure to these conditions, the sensor often will either display a failure message or will not allow the operator to fully adjust the display reading. Harsh operating and storage conditions can affect instrument performance, leading to inaccurate readings or even failure. While a DRPGM may appear undamaged during visual inspection, it actually could be damaged internally. At this point, the operator should replace the damaged sensor or have qualified personnel service the sensor. Be sure to follow the manufacturer’s instructions regarding sensor replacement and servicing.
Worker Safety: The Number One Reason for Proper and Regular Calibration
The primary reason for proper, regular instrument calibration is to provide accurate gas-concentration readings that could prevent worker illness, injury, or death. Correctly calibrating an instrument helps to ensure that the DRPGM will respond accurately to the gases it is designed to detect, thereby warning users of hazardous conditions before the conditions reach dangerous levels. Some DRPGMs have two levels of alarms – warning and danger. The warning alarm alerts the operator and workers that the work environment has a detectable elevated concentration of toxic gas and is, therefore, potentially hazardous. The danger alarm indicates that the toxic-gas concentration exceeds the programmed hazard threshold, and that the toxic gas in the work area is above the warning level and approaching a hazardous level. Whether a DRPGM provides a warning or danger alarm at the proper concentration depends on its detection capabilities, its ability to translate its findings into an accurate reading, and the presence of interfering gases (see “Calibration Drift and Causes” above).
Bump Tests, Calibration Checks, and Full Calibration
Bump Test (or Function Check)
This is a qualitative function check in which a challenge gas is passed over the sensor(s) at a concentration and exposure time sufficient to activate all alarm settings. The purpose of this check is to confirm that gas can get to the sensor(s) and that all the instrument’s alarms are functional. The bump test or function check does not provide a measure of the instrument’s accuracy. When performing a bump test, the challenge gas concentration should trigger the DRPGM’s alarm(s).
Unfortunately, such “challenge gases” are not readily available for several compounds, including hydrogen peroxide, hydrazine, peracetic acid, and formaldehyde.
Calibration Check (or Full Calibration)
There are two methods for verifying DRPGM accuracy: a calibration check and a full calibration. Each method is appropriate under certain conditions.
A calibration check verifies that the sensor(s) and alarms respond within the manufacturer’s acceptable limits by exposing the instrument to a test gas. The operator compares the reading to the test-gas concentration (as indicated on the cylinder containing the test gas). If the instrument’s response is within the acceptable range of the test-gas concentration (typically ± 10-20% of the test-gas concentration), then the calibration check verified the instrument’s accuracy. (Note: OSHA recommends that operators check with the instrument’s manufacturer for the acceptable tolerance ranges.) An operator should “zero” an instrument (reset the reference point, in some cases “zero air” gas may be needed) before conducting the calibration check to ensure that the calibration check results are accurate. When performing a calibration check, the test-gas concentration should be high enough to trigger the instrument’s alarm(s).
Note that ISEA ignores permeation devices, and compounds that do not have readily available field calibration standards. Note also that “± 10-20% of the test-gas concentration” seems to be an unacceptably forgiving tolerance range.
If the calibration check results are not within the acceptable range, the operator should perform a full calibration. A full calibration adjusts the instrument’s reading to coincide with a known concentration (i.e., certified standard) of test gas. Test gas used for calibration gas should always be certified using a standard traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
Too bad that NIST does not have gas standards for many toxic gases under OSHA jurisdiction. In such cases, gas standard vendors can claim that their manufacturing and analytical methods conform to NIST.
When to Perform a Bump Test and When to Perform a Full Calibration
In the past, there has been some confusion regarding proper calibration procedures and frequency. To clarify this issue, ISEA updated its position statement on instrument calibration in 2010, stating, “A bump test…or calibration check of portable gas monitors should be conducted before each day’s use in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.” If an instrument fails a bump test or a calibration check, the operator should perform a full calibration on it before using it. If the instrument fails the full calibration, the employer should remove it from service. Contact the manufacturer for assistance or service.
The following are a few basic calibration rules for DRPGMs:
- Follow the manufacturer’s guidelines for proper calibration. Operators cannot perform any job, including DRPGM calibration, properly or safely without the right tools. The type and concentration of calibration test gas, sample tubing, flow regulators, and calibration adapters are key links in the calibration chain. Operators should conduct any testing to verify the operation of the gas monitor in an environment that is the same as (or similar to) the working conditions (e.g., temperature, humidity, atmospheric pressure).
- Only use a certified traceable test gas, and do so before its expiration date. The instrument can only be as accurate as the test gas used to calibrate it. Be certain that the supplier can provide a certificate of analysis for every test-gas cylinder. The concentration of the test gas, particularly reactive gases such as hydrogen sulfide and chlorine, will only remain stable for a limited period. Never use a test gas after its expiration date.
- Train DRPGM operators on the proper methods of calibration. Most instruments are designed to be field calibrated with detailed instructions provided in the manufacturer’s user manual, training videos, or computer-based training modules. Employers should train and test everyone responsible for performing DRPGM calibration.
Again, ISEA begs the question of calibration standard availability.
Many workplaces have a risk of injury, illness, or death from respiratory hazards such as oxygen deficiency and the combustible or toxic gases. DRPGM technology and products exist to minimize such risks. Properly verifying the function and accuracy of instruments before each day’s use will help to ensure that each worker finishes the job safely.
We commend ISEA for emphasizing the importance of calibration, in the proper operation of gas detection instruments, in this introductory treatment. Interscan welcomes your inquiries on this and any other matter related to gas detection. Consider our popular SENSOR EXPRESS® program for all of your calibration needs.